Speaking of Richard Garriott, anyone ever think to try and contact him for support?
I have a couple of better-than-acquaintance-not-quite-good-friends of Garriott trying to get some time to talk to him about this.
Brian Clayton (PICTURE in ThorsAssassin's blog post about the dev dinner) is the studio manager of Formerly-Known-As Paragon. I have generally heard from him on Sunday night. I did not hear from him this Sunday, so I have nothing to tell you.This, from my husband Larry Dixon however:Larry Dixon: *shrug* It's as "real" as anything else NCsoft says or does. That'll flip if they want it to. What it *is* is an admission that they've noticed enough to respond to it "on company letterhead." Its face value is meaningless.The REAL takeaway from this is "Hey this is starting to hurt, stop it guys!" If the revival efforts meant nothing, NCsoft would not post what amounts to "Elvis has left the building." And that is all that is. They want the negative attention to stop. That is an official attempt at deflection. Or, in political terms, an "Un-Answer."It appears to be a response but actually accomplishes nothing except silence those who weren't very into it. Like I say, what it says is irrelevant; the thing to take notice of is that it was put there at all. And that means time to step it up because the other fighter just staggered.If the "Save CoH/We love Paragon" etc. efforts were ineffective, we'd never have seen such a statement. The hidden meaning of that note is that it has dawned on somebody that this is developing into "anti-NCsoft," not "Save-CoH," so they issued a mollifying statement with a lot of buttonpushing feel-warm cozy buttons about how special what they just murdered was to them.Now they reap the mistrust they sowed, they can see the coverage increase, the caution against them and the players taking their money away in droves, and we can look them steely in the eyes and reply "Too bad. It's just business. Isn't it."The "exhausted all options" is bizspeak for "We didn't get what we wanted, so we stopped bothering to find solutions." Businesspeople who truly WANT a result ALWAYS find a way, they never "exhaust all options." So right there is an admission from NCsoft that they're very bad businesspeople. Most certainly unimaginative and inflexible.Shortest form: As a strategist, the hits are being felt by NCsoft, and they've barely begun.Second message: This is the murderer issuing an official statement that they "really tried hard" not kill what they had a choice about murdering, and hoping that "Oh they loved it like I did, they're really sorry!" should be your takeaway from that and that should make EVERYTHING just fine, right?I don't take "We loved it too!" as anything but an insult to our intelligence.
...I don't take "We loved it too!" as anything but an insult to our intelligence.
By the way, the #MMOKiller tag should really be #GameKiller - it carries more weight with non-gamers who mightn't know what MMO meant. Game = fun/entertainemnt, so adding "Killer" to that makes for a much clearer message - NCSoft kills fun.
By the way, the #MMOKiller tag should really be #GameKiller - it carries mroe weirght with non-gamers who mightn't know what MMO meant. Game = fun/entertainemnt, so adding "Killer" to that makes for a much clearer message - NCSoft kills fun.
By the way, the #MMOKiller tag should really be #GameKiller - it carries more weirght with non-gamers who mightn't know what MMO meant. Game = fun/entertainment, so adding "Killer" to that makes for a much clearer message - NCSoft kills fun.
By the way, the #MMOKiller tag should really be #GameKiller - it carries more weirght with non-gamers who mightn't know what MMO meant. Game = fun/entertainemnt, so adding "Killer" to that makes for a much clearer message - NCSoft kills fun.
I advice #GameKiller, but not #Anti-NCSoft. The second one makes us look kinda like whining kids throwing hate directly at a group, because the tag calls them out -by- -name-. #GameKiller is a little less direct. Less aggressive.
