What Cende and others said. I've previously explained extensively (over in "Legal Considerations") about how things like the reasonable person standard and the difficulty of obtaining evidence of intent to deceive make a successful fraud or fraud-like action (including false advertising claims under the Lanham Act) highly unlikely.
Even weeks after it was first brought up, I still see people treating the idea of suing NCSoft for fraud as some sort of magical solution to all our problems. It isn't. Our goal is to keep CoH alive without getting ourselves into trouble. This probably requires us to pry the IP out of NCSoft's grip and get it into the hands of someone who'll keep the game alive. That's it. Suing NCSoft just isn't the right tool for finishing that job. Here's what I said about the issue in a PM to someone on the subject of potential actions:
"With all [the stuff I discussed in 'Legal Considerations' about how hard it would be to sue successfully], I think litigation just isn't the right option for this problem. To use an elaborate metaphor, our ultimate goal is to pound a nail into a wall (i.e., keep the game alive in some form). Litigation, in this scenario, is like a rotary saw. It's really, really easy to hurt yourself with it if you're not extremely careful. Moreover, all the indignation in the world, no matter how righteous and how rightful, can't turn that saw into a hammer."
In other words, you have every right to be upset and feel that NCSoft treated you badly. But, as legitimate as those feelings are, that doesn't automatically translate into the ability to sue them.
***
Unrelated trivia point: When I was in college in Albuquerque, I lived near the McDonald's in the famous coffee case and used to go through the drive-thru all the time. This was during the period when the woman got injured. I never did order coffee there, though.
