Author Topic: Teaming and Supergroups  (Read 4794 times)

ukaserex

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Teaming and Supergroups
« on: August 09, 2014, 11:23:00 PM »
I came across a comment on one of the CoH facebook pages, which left me puzzled.

If it's not too intrusive, how many of you teamed only or primarily with SG players, as opposed to just joining whatever teams happened to be forming at the time?

The comment I came across was from a player who said his SG no longer played, or had disbanded so he never did any iTrials. This kind of puzzled me, as being in an SG wasn't a requirement. I know some people are uncomfortable teaming with people they don't know. However, for an iTrial, with some of its gated content, I'd think an SG only iTrial would be the exception, rather than the norm. But, since I was in an SG of one for the most part, I may not have a clue as to what the rest of you were doing.

Did this happen often? If so, how often did your group do iTrials?

Also, did some of you belong to multiple SGs on the same server? Or did you stick primarily to that one group as well as maybe having one SG specifically as a place to stash all your loot?
Those who have no idea what they are doing genuinely have no idea that they don't know what they're doing. - John Cleese

Angel Phoenix77

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
  • I am Phoenix !!
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2014, 11:29:27 PM »
I came across a comment on one of the CoH facebook pages, which left me puzzled.

If it's not too intrusive, how many of you teamed only or primarily with SG players, as opposed to just joining whatever teams happened to be forming at the time?

The comment I came across was from a player who said his SG no longer played, or had disbanded so he never did any iTrials. This kind of puzzled me, as being in an SG wasn't a requirement. I know some people are uncomfortable teaming with people they don't know. However, for an iTrial, with some of its gated content, I'd think an SG only iTrial would be the exception, rather than the norm. But, since I was in an SG of one for the most part, I may not have a clue as to what the rest of you were doing.

Did this happen often? If so, how often did your group do iTrials?

Also, did some of you belong to multiple SGs on the same server? Or did you stick primarily to that one group as well as maybe having one SG specifically as a place to stash all your loot?
When I first started and made my supergroup I would say I almost teamed with them, than as time went on and they left I started to run with a different super group and or solo. After a year and a half they all but left and that left me to only solo, which did get boring so I would run with pugs some where awesome but most did not mess well. The only time I would actively team is if there was a task force. Near the end I would duo and trio, and team.
I only ran the itrials when I was a paid member, and I almost always had bad teams that would quit so I would only gain and I am not kidding 25000 worth of point.
One day the Phoenix will rise again.

Aggelakis

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 3,001
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #2 on: August 09, 2014, 11:36:30 PM »
None of my SGs had enough commonly active members to do a task force, let alone an iTrial.

Then again, I solo'd most of the time; if I teamed it was typically with friends. I only did a few iTrials. (The furthest I got was TPN.)
Bob Dole!! Bob Dole. Bob Dole! Bob Dole. Bob Dole. Bob Dole... Bob Dole... Bob... Dole...... Bob...


ParagonWiki
OuroPortal

Shifter

  • Boss
  • ****
  • Posts: 147
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #3 on: August 10, 2014, 01:16:48 AM »
If it's not too intrusive, how many of you teamed only or primarily with SG players, as opposed to just joining whatever teams happened to be forming at the time?

I teamed with people from private channels primarily, ones with players I enjoyed playing with. I'd try those channels first, and then go to public channels if I needed bodies to fill the quota or something. It's hard for me to answer your question as private channels took over the primary function of SGs in my eyes (that being to bring together a sub group of players to play together), but I guess I would have to say this falls into the "joining whatever teams happened" bucket the way your question is worded.
Stone Tank
Freedom Server

blacksly

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 513
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #4 on: August 10, 2014, 01:34:50 AM »
I generally teamed with PUG... I like some challenge, and it's a challenge to keep some PUGs alive. Meanwhile, my SG, the Legion, generally steamrolled through content to the point where you would hardly notice if a couple of the players went AFK for a minute. I only enjoyed that for a bit at a time... CoH is pretty easy when everyone on the team has good builds and knows what they're doing. I was only interested in "pretty easy" once in a while, the rest of the time I tried to raise the difficulty by inviting random strangers with the LFT tag on. Actually, some of the best teams were a combination of Legion and PUG, as that usually gave enough solid players to not have to worry about regular wipes, while still on occasion managing to turn up a Leroy Jenkins to raise the difficulty level.

Microcosm

  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 89
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #5 on: August 10, 2014, 01:46:44 AM »
I almost exclusively PUG'ed. SGs seemed to always require, or at least expect, consistent time commitments which I couldn't/wasn't willing to give. I also played multiple alts, and might leave one alone for months at a time. By the time I picked up that character again, he would usually be kicked out for long absence.

PUGs had the downside of occasionally being terrible, but usually they were good enough.

Paragon Avenger

  • Circles and Triangles
  • Elite Boss
  • *
  • Posts: 6,246
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #6 on: August 10, 2014, 05:43:32 AM »
For iTrials, sorry Apple, PUG to fill the league.
For TF's I used channels.
For regular content solo'd or found friends.
For events I would PUG.

My SG was my bank. Only my toons allowed.

Burnt Toast

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 548
  • Tastes Good!
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #7 on: August 10, 2014, 06:42:51 AM »
My SG was just me...
Back when I ran a very large SG we teamed a lot together...mainly just missions and the occasional TF. (This was before Itrials existed back in 2006-2008).


Itrials - I usually ran them or ran with friends...we would get a core group of friends and then invite other randoms.
TFs - Almost exclusively friends and people from private channels.
Missions - Friends or PUG.
PLing - Almost always just friends.

DBadger

  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 79
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #8 on: August 10, 2014, 12:52:05 PM »
The EU servers were probably a bit different. I had a SG with a fairly small base of players, we did stuff like regular levelling groups, but I mainly grouped for TFs etc with people from the various Global Channels (mainly Sals Badgehunters on Union, can't remember what the Defiant one was)

It tended to be the same group of players at the same sort of times, especially enjoyed lunch time ITFs

PLing, I had two accounts so just used my Brute to PL heroes on my main account to around L20

Missions, I pretty much soloed everything, only occasionally grouped up outside of TFs etc

Charged Mastermind

  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 98
  • I was 10 when I made this name i know it is dumb
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #9 on: August 10, 2014, 02:27:16 PM »
My Dad and Mom used to play with only family friends, and they gave us our accounts because they got bored and work was becoming a hastle. The family friends gave their sons their accounts but they didn't play much because they had strict rules about gaming and stuff. That was back around Issue 13 I think. So I never really played any iTrials with people I really knew.

That being said, in most other games I had to worry about PUG teams being bad because we would have that one guy that wouldn't know HOW to play the game and not know how to play the mission, so I steered away and did some soloing because I knew it would piss me off less than soloing.

But in City of Heroes it didn't really seem like I had to worry about PUG because most of the TF's, trials, missions, stuff like that were fairly simplistic and almost all people that wanted to team were people that were higher levels and actually knew how to play the game instead of running into it blindly.

AlphaFerret

  • Boss
  • ****
  • Posts: 127
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #10 on: August 10, 2014, 04:07:35 PM »
I was a PUG maniac.
SGs seemed to have a short life span of being highly active.  It was always very cool when your sg was out in force.

Sajaana

  • Boss
  • ****
  • Posts: 105
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #11 on: August 10, 2014, 04:53:57 PM »
My SG was a roleplay SG (VoPC).  When we teamed up, it was basically for our daily roleplaying plot either in the AE or via the radio.

I did most of the iTrials, story arcs, task forces and levelling via pick up groups...pick up groups which were never ever boring or regretful.  The best thing about CoH is that you could help your SG even if you went solo or in pick up groups because of the "SG mode".

SerialBeggar

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 720
    • Serial Beggar
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2014, 10:14:53 PM »
My SG was basically me.  My brother was in it in the early years, but we hardly every team together except as a filler for a TF and he later left the game.  Thus all the teams I've ever been in were PUGs.  I prefer larger teams because they're more dynamic.  During my first year, I joined a few duos and trios, but they were boring, especially if I joined with someone who was playing as dedicated support.  Perhaps it was just me being naturally cautious as a newbie, so I didn't know how to cut loose and make things more exciting.  Later as a long time veteran of the game and everything had already been done dozens of times, being in PUGs was the only thing that gave the game some spontaneity.

[edit for spelling]
« Last Edit: August 11, 2014, 03:32:42 AM by SerialBeggar »
Teams are the number one killers of Soloists.

Optimus Dex

  • Boss
  • ****
  • Posts: 121
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #13 on: August 11, 2014, 12:14:28 AM »
My supergroup was my sons and a friend of mine and me. My sons drifted off and about year 7 so di my friend . So there was some supergroup running but I was in mostly pug's . Most of them were surprisingly good. ITF  I  usually got invites or saw group forming in chat.

ukaserex

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 500
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #14 on: August 11, 2014, 01:31:22 AM »
Very enlightening stuff, thanks!  :D
Those who have no idea what they are doing genuinely have no idea that they don't know what they're doing. - John Cleese

Winter Fable

  • Lieutenant
  • ***
  • Posts: 68
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #15 on: August 11, 2014, 01:43:48 AM »
Pugs all the way.My husband and I were sad to see so many people calling for teams or being kicked for having KB powers so we started the No Rules Radio missions on Freedom.We took whomever wanted to team and let them use any powers and had fun.I played my emp and my husband used his tank to keep pulling mobs from far away rooms so before we finish with one mob another was there which ment it was crazy fun.We felt in order to help the game we should keep teams running so anyone could join and have fun.

Angel Phoenix77

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,136
  • I am Phoenix !!
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #16 on: August 11, 2014, 09:18:22 PM »
I was a PUG maniac.
SGs seemed to have a short life span of being highly active.  It was always very cool when your sg was out in force.
this is very true :), it was painful when your sg mates either quit or just quit the game.
One day the Phoenix will rise again.

Ankhammon

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 676
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #17 on: August 11, 2014, 09:33:08 PM »
this is very true :), it was painful when your sg mates either quit or just quit the game.

I much preferred SG for TFs. I just had way too many experiences with PUGs that fell apart a couple missions into the TF leaving me alone to try to finish it.
I usually did, but it sometimes took many many hours.
Cogito, Ergo... eh?

Battlechimp

  • Boss
  • ****
  • Posts: 190
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #18 on: August 11, 2014, 09:39:55 PM »
I'd have to say, most of my teaming was PUGs.  I was a member of two relatively large SGs, The Paragonian Knights and Legion of Catgirls :-)

The first one, we did do TFs together, although not large enough to get enough people to do SG I trials.  Teaming was mostly from people in sg chat going "hey anyone want to do X?". Sometimes full groups, others a few SG members and we'd fill with random people.

The LoC though we'd do weekly TFs, we'd regularly have two or three teams filled with cat girls, then filled teams up with random people as needed. 

But for the most part I soloed, mostly because on weekdays when I place, I tend to randomly afk, so I tried not to inflict that on others.  But when I did team, there might be a couple sg mates, but everything else was random PUG.
Some men were born to greatness, others had it thrust upon them.  Me?  I punted. - Col Cranston Snord

Blow things up! Blow things up! Blow things up! Blo... wait, not that!! - Jammers everywhen

Mistress Urd

  • Elite Boss
  • *****
  • Posts: 506
Re: Teaming and Supergroups
« Reply #19 on: August 11, 2014, 09:48:28 PM »
I teamed with people from private channels primarily, ones with players I enjoyed playing with. I'd try those channels first, and then go to public channels if I needed bodies to fill the quota or something. It's hard for me to answer your question as private channels took over the primary function of SGs in my eyes (that being to bring together a sub group of players to play together), but I guess I would have to say this falls into the "joining whatever teams happened" bucket the way your question is worded.

Same here, most of the broadcast or blind invite teams were usually a waste of time. I used private channels for most teaming purposes, because I know those folks were fun to team with.