edit: Before reading my off-topic rant below, let me add something useful:
http://stormlord.us <--- both press releases I've made are here. The one about media day is a little out-dated; I will see about making a new version that isn't doubling as an invitation to the 20th.
/edit*resistance to political bait failed*
Normally, even when I think somebody is blowing something out of proportion in order to justify taking offense because they
want to be offended by something, I can at least see the logic chain (even if I find the premise faulty) that gets them from what actually happened to "that's offensive!" But I literally cannot see how this is in any way offensive, other than "Mitt Romney said it, and I am professionally obligated to take offense at anything the Republicans say."
How
else do you review candidates than by getting piles, stacks, sheafs, reams, or files full of potential people to fill roles? Is there something about arranging this information into binders - I'm assuming of the three-ring, loose-leaf variety - that makes it more offensive than, say, if he'd gotten "CDs full of women?"
If anything, the fact that Obama apparently never gets binders full of applicants for jobs and just divines them from thin air is more frightening, to me. It indicates he doesn't take the job seriously. (Of course, I think he and Biden are lying about their methods, if only by omission and implication that they do NOT do something similar, but that's beside the point.) I mean, what, are Obama's more-golf-games-than-any-other-president actually divination rituals, with candidates' pictures on the golf balls and each hole labeled for a particular job?
...sorry. The professionally offended crowd really annoy me, as does anything that smacks of total illogic. And this is both. I'll shut up now. ^^;