Another comment, this one about how tight the writing was for Civil War. No movie is perfect, and there are always going to be little flaws here and there. But this film seems to have less glaring ones regarding plot. I was watching this recently:
4 Huge Plot Holes in Captain America: Civil War Here are those four "huge" plot holes, scrubbed of spoilers:
1. Why wasn't the Vision at the first fight in Lagos. Err, why is this a plot hole? Is the presumption that the Vision should be at every Avengers mission possible? The complaint is that if the Vision was there the fight could have been resolved more easily. But to call this a major plot hole seems to be a stretch. This often comes up when someone complains about a plot hole. They call something a plot hole if the story doesn't have a reason to go the way they think it should. But that's not a plot hole. It is a plot hole only if the story moves in a nonsensical way with no reasonable explanation. "The Vision doesn't go on every Avengers mission" is not a nonsensical story point.
2. Ross tries to guilt trip the Avengers but fails to mention things like the WSC attempting to nuke New York and Rogers fails to mention this either. A lot of people keep pointing this out, but first it is not a plot hole if people act differently than you, it is only a plot hole if they act out of character for incomprehensible reasons. Ross is trying to make the case that people are afraid of the Avengers. He actually stated that explicitly. Rogers saying "well, you guys do bad things also" is irrelevant to that point, and Rogers doesn't mention it precisely because it is irrelevant and Rogers didn't grow up arguing on the internet. It is not a plot hole if people discuss things differently than you.
3. Zemo's plan requires the Sokovia Accords. No it doesn't. Sorry, the video makers are just wrong. Their claim that we have to assume Zemo "thought on his feet" to adapt to the Sokovia Accords is equally wrong. Absolutely no part of Zemo's plan requires the Sokovia Accords to be enacted. In an alternate world where the Accords are never enacted, Zemo's plan works equally well. I don't know why they even mention it. Unless they had a four bullet list quota.
4. What would Zemo have done if Tony didn't act the way he did at the end of the movie? Uh, nothing. His plan didn't require Tony to do anything. It would have been less interesting for us as movie goers if Tony didn't go where he went, but Zemo isn't trying to look good for a movie he doesn't know he's in. Once Zemo found what he was looking for, as far as he was concerned he won. The rest was inevitable. Unless Captain America, say, murdered him and buried him and everything he had in the snow. As long as Zemo assumes that's not going to happen, he wins.
These guys make a living pointing out plot holes, and this is the best they got. That tells me the writers did their jobs pretty well.
4.